One is the Material module, which is already started (. I'll make a test with a drop-down list property already, then we see how it behaves.Ībout the rest, there are two new things coming to FreeCAD, that, I think, will fulfill your wishes. The main reason for me to use freecad, Real BIM These guys are doing exact what I have been wishing myself from Allplan Nemetschek for years, real BIM.īerndhahnebach wrote:The property value and python would gibe us endless possibilities, CAD-Systems without such a python konsole never ever could offer. When I first read about the separation of element properties between real data and view information in freecad a few weeks ago I was immediately thinking. My english is not as good as it should be. In Register Data of element properties the property is choosen by a drop-down list and the value could be a drop-down list or a string or a int or something else. The idea could be having a separate widget to define and activate the property and the type of value for the marked building elements. )Ĭolor -> blue (the real color the real element will have, not the one of freecad)Ĭolor typ -> the color typ one needs to buy for painting the colorĬolor application -> coating or spray-coatĪnti-corrosive protection -> hot-dip galvanisedĬoncrete antifreeze protection typ -> XF1Ĭoncrete de-icing salt protection -> yesĬoncrete de-icing salt protection -> XD3 Load-bearing -> yes or no (one of the most important for me, because I have got further ideas. For the form work the approach would be similar. I just need to distinguish between differnt typs of concrete according the properties. For the building shell, the one I'm interested in, it would be not to difficault to do such document because most important dimension (concrete volume) is allready available for arch elemets in freecad. Having all the defined properties in freecad it would be possible to do a contract document or an estimate of costs for which all dimensions and properties of a building are needed. In my opinion the biggest lack of Allplan, a really huuuuuuuuuge one. One has to group elements to layers and change the visibility of layers. But in Nemetschek Allplan it is not possible to change the visibility of an element according the element properties. One can choose from a cataloge of more than 500 properties and of course define their own properties. In Nemetschek Allplan the property is called attribut. The whole openstreetmapformat ist done this way. I'm going one step further, there are actually hundreds of properties which could be defined the way Property -> Value. Yea I like the drop-down list property idea. An arch elemet reinforcement would be much more easier than all this cylinders. I could provide every information regarding reinforcement, hopfully It's the buissnis I work in, doing structural calculations and reinforcement drawings. I'm gone open a new thread as soon as the script runs the way I want it to run. Value -> ifcslab, ifcbeam, ifcolumn, ifcwall, ifcallthearchitectureelementswhichmakesabuildinghomelikebutengineersdontcareabout. Such property would be even exact what one needs to distingish between building elements. If freecad will export to ifc one day, it needs such property. NEMETSCHEK ALLPLAN 2009 KOSTENLOS SOFTWAREIn both software the user can change this property. In my new opinion (after I have been thinking ) this should be defined using a Data Property.īy the way in Nemetschek Allplan as well as Tekla Structures every Element has a property to which ifcobject it gets exported. For this reason I need to distingish between elements. For example the volume of concrte columns and volume of concrete walls and volume of concrete slabs. I would like to do dimension calculation on modells using freecad. I'm fine without it (for now ) because the main reason I was asking was to distinguish slabs from other elements. I have been thinking if I really need a seperate element slab.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |